Mac

MacBook Pro Vs. MacBook Pro with Retina Display

9 Mins read

Launching the new MacBook Pro with Attendant Design Retina display has created confusion among users, who now have a choice between the MacBook Pro and the MacBook Pro Retina display.

Did You Know?

Retina display refers to a show wherein the naked eye cannot discern the individual pixels. This value differs from product to product, with smaller shows (iPhone) having higher values (326 ppi) and larger displays (MacBooks) having lower values (220 ppi). This is due to the viewing distance that differs in these products.

Macintosh machines have been gaining ground steadily, thanks partly to their more secure platform and the good looks they come with. Of course, PCs are no slouch when it comes to good looks, but one can’t compete with Apple in the looks department.

And if you’re more inclined to look beyond the looks, as you should be―you will, after all, be spending upwards of a stack on these―you have nothing to fear. The specs of the current models will satisfy even the most hardcore users. Once you pick up a Mac, you must choose one from their extensive family. Apple has models galore, and you can choose one depending on your use.

MacBook Pro

Today’s article will consider the MacBook Pro vs. MacBook Pro with Retina display. Though it may seem that only the show has changed between the two models, this is far from true. There are many differences between the two models, and in the sections below, we highlight these differences and guide you in choosing the better of the two.

RELATED ARTICLES :

13-inch MacBook Pro 13-inch Macbook ProWith Retina Display
Display

13.3-inch LED-Backlit Display 13.3-inch LED-Backlit Retina display

1280 by 800 pixels, 2560 by 1600 pixels

Processor
2.5 GHz Dual-core Intel Core i5 2.4 GHz or 2.5 GHz Dual-core Intel Core i5
2.9 GHz Dual-core Intel Core i7 2.8 GHz Dual-core Intel Core i7

Memory (RAM)
4 GB or 8 GB 1600 MHz Up to 16 GB 1600 MHz

Storage
Up to 1 TB 5,400 rpm HDD or Up to 512 GB SSD Up to 1 TB Flash Storage (SSD)

Graphics
Intel HD Graphics 4000 Intel Iris Graphics

Ports
MagSafe Power Port MagSafe 2 Power Port
2× USB 3 Ports 2× USB 3.0 Ports
1× FireWire 800 Port —
1× Thunderbolt Port 2× Thunderbolt Port
— 1× HDMI Port
Superdrive No Optical Drive

Battery
Integrated 63.5-watt-hour Lithium-Polymer Integrated 71.8-watt-hour

Lithium-Polymer
Up to 7 Hours Wireless Web Up to 9 Hours Wireless Web
60 W MagSafe Power Adapter 60 W MagSafe 2 Power Adapter

Size
.95 inches thick
4.5 pounds .71 inches thick
3.46 pounds

Miscellaneous
802.11n Wi-Fi 802.11ac Wi-Fi

Gigabit Ethernet —

Bluetooth 4.0

FaceTime HD Camera

Full-size Backlit Keyboard

SDXC Card Slot

Mavericks

If you look at the table above, you can see that almost everything has improved with the new Retina display Mac. Don’t be fooled by the higher clock speeds of the older versions; the latest Haswell processors present in the Retina model, coupled with the Iris and Iris Pro integrated graphics, are much better than the older processors and Intel 4000 HD graphics. The breakdown in other parts of the machine also should bring you to the same conclusion that we came to, that the Retina display model is far better than the non-retina model. But with a price difference of a hundred bucks, I’m sure you will need more than just a paragraph to be convinced.

Reasons to Buy the MacBook Pro Retina Model

While it is almost a rule of thumb that newer is better, let’s see if it applies in this case. Of course, more recent is better regarding technology, but you should also keep the price in mind. New tech can cost a bomb, and you don’t want to sell your house to have a dapper computer. When it comes to the Retina display model of the MacBook Pro, the first thing you would notice is that the price is a hundred dollars more. Is this a good thing or a bad thing? To decide, let’s see what you get for those extra hundred bucks.

Display

Let’s start with the most noticeable factor: The display. You get a much, much better screen. 2560 × 1600 pixels as compared to the older 1280 × 800 pixels. That alone should be worth the extra hundred dollars. The higher resolution makes a huge difference, and don’t let anyone tell you otherwise.

Processor, Memory, and Graphics

Moving on from the price, the new Retina display model features Haswell processors and Intel Iris Pro graphics, again a boost over the older processors and HD 4000 integrated graphics. Though discrete graphics would have been better, these 13-inch models only have integrated graphics. Remember that you only put in USD 100 more over the older model, which is worth it. Also, Apple has been more generous with the RAM limitation on the newer model; the Retina display can now take up to 16 gigs of RAM, compared to the maximum of 8 gigs on the older machines.

Storage Space

When it comes to storage, the norm is more the better. You can never really have enough space. With the world going HD, the area is now even more of a problem. We want to say that so-and-so amount of storage space is enough, but it depends on the user. Luckily, you can choose the amount of storage you need on the newer MacBook Pro, up to a huge 1 TB SSD. The price will undoubtedly increase accordingly, but the option is nice to have. For those users who don’t need so much space, the base model comes with an ample 128 GB of space, but more importantly, on an SSD. SSDs don’t feature moving parts, and read/write speeds are phenomenally faster than HDDs. If you need more space and don’t want to shell out the USD 300 to upgrade to a 512 GB SSD, then you can pick up a 500 GB external HHD for your storage needs. However, with the cloud sector booming, this is becoming less and less necessary.

Ports

The newer Retina display model also does not feature an optical drive, which counts significantly to its svelte size, shape, and weight. This might be a problem for some, but optical discs are being used less often, so it should not be too bad. You could also opt for an external optical drive; these are not too expensive, and even the extra 20 bucks the drive costs make the newer MacBook worth it. Apart from all this, there are numerous other benefits that the Retina display model has, like the presence of an HDMI port (absent in non-retina models) and the upgrade of the USB ports to USB 3.0. Additionally, there is an extra Thunderbolt port as well. The newer model also features Apple’s latest MagSafe 2 technology, which comes on both, the port and the adapter.

Size, Weight, and Battery Life

Thanks to the SSD’s ‘s exclusionSSD’s inclusion and the optical drive’s exclusion, the newer MacBook Pro with Retina display is now even thinner and lighter than its predecessor. At less than 3½ pounds, this is a very delicate machine, almost a pound lighter than the non-retina model. It is also significantly thinner, at .71 inches, compared to the older model, at .91 inches. In all this slimming and trimming, Apple has ensured that the battery life does not suffer; in fact, with the newer model you get up to 9 hours of wireless web surfing, compared to the 7 hours its predecessor offered.

Miscellaneous

In addition, there are a few miscellaneous features that both laptops share, like the Facetime HD camera in front, the keyboard, the SDXC card slot, and the latest OS Mavericks. These features are already the latest, and hence, were not improved in the new model. However, However, Wi-Fi has been improved, and the Retina display models will now feature 802.11ac Wi-Fi, compared to the older 802.11n Wi-Fi. We can’t say that this is more beneficial right now, though it will surely be in the future.

So, if you look at the various features you get with the newer MacBook Pro, it is well worth the extra 100 dollars you will pay for it. Remember, the comparisons here are the base models; these can be configured with better and higher configurations, which will affect the prices. As a product with newer technology, we would have had no qualms recommending the more recent version anyway; the cost of the older machine makes it easier to do so. If Apple drops the cost of the older version to about USD 700 to USD 800, then there may be a compelling reason to opt for older people. At this price point, however, it’s a no-brainer.

Hardware

The model under the microscope is the high-end 15″ model, which contains a 2.2ghz Sandy Bride quad-core i7 processor, four gb ram, and a 6750m from AMD. That’s a big upgrade from the previous generation. I’ve also opted for the high-res screen given in my (Mac!)book. *pun intended* Apart from the high-end 15″ Macbook Pro, Apple offers two 13″ models and a single 17″ machine. Across the board, each model enjoys a faster processor, ram, and a thunderbolt.

The latter is very interesting and a first for any laptop on the market! I’m not going into too much detail about it, but it’s Intel’s answer to USB. The connection can simultaneously transfer video, audio, and data at very high speeds. That means a DVD movie will transfer to external storage in about 6 seconds once supported hardware comes out.

When deciding between models realize that the 13″ models all share an Intel HD 3000 graphics as a sole provider. This is a source of frustration for gamers because the chip is pretty weak for modern games. The smaller models also use the gaps between the keys as speaker holes and lack a subwoofer; expect a slightly more tin sound. The 17″ model has a 1920×1200 display and similar specs to the 15″ Macbook Pro. This is both a good and bad thing. The good thing is that you’ll have slightly more screen real estate, but gaming on the native resolution will struggle.

Body

As noted, Apple has retained its famous unibody design for this generation of Macbooks. I don’t consider this a bad thing. Built from a single piece of aluminum, this laptop is scratch-resistant and clean-looking. My previous Macbook Pro (same design) withstood the test of time. (not a single scratch!) In my view, this is the best-looking laptop apart from the Macbook Air. Its design is very symmetrical. Everything is exactly where you’d expect it to be, like how the speaker holes match the vertical space used by the keyboard keys. The width of the hinge also perfectly fits the horizontal keyboard space. Using a combination of black and silver, Apple created something aesthetically pleasing. However, I’d have loved to see some Macbook Air elements take over. The battery indicator seems unnecessary to me, and the DVD super drive is bound to disappear. Guess we can expect those changes in a redesign later on. Still, the Macbook Pro 2011 is the sturdiest and best-looking laptop, a real winner!

Display

The 15″ model comes standard with a resolution of 1440×900. This can be upgraded to 1680×1050, something everyone should do. Unfortunately, Apple uses a high-end TN display, so there is still no IPS. The viewing angles are decent. It’s possible to read a text and distinguish details at any angle. However, inevitably, the screen washes out from the sides, especially grays become yellowish; notice the app store panel lines. I also noticed the screen has a weak spot for lower and upper angles. Even at a small degree, colors started to fade. This is why we want IPS panels; they’re noticeably better at this. Still, the MacBook Pro has one of the better screens out there. The colors pop and the pixel density feels just right. People looking for ultra-realistic color reproductions must look at production screens; what else is new?

For the first time, Apple managed to jam an HD Facetime camera into the glossy display. This is a logical step in developing video calling between Apple devices. I called my laptop using the iPhone 4 and configured the Facetime app to test this. Calling is easy and direct. Click a phone number or e-mail in your contacts, and the system will attempt to set up a Facetime call. Depending on the network, this process can sometimes take a little longer, but it’s usually a smooth ride after the initial procedure. The image is crisp and pleasing, but without being overwhelming. The idea is still soft and comparable to Logitech solutions at best; still, for such a small camera, that’s a solid achievement.

Benchmarks

Now it’s time to put the internals to the test. This is Apple’s fastest notebook offering, so my expectations were sky-high. The first thing I wanted to have a look at is the battery. Apple advertises 7 hours of battery for every Macbook Pro model it offers. That’s down from 8-10 hours for the previous generation. Most of this is probably due to the faster processor and a new way of testing that supposedly better represents real-world results.

I fully charged the laptop and left the settings at default. The brightness sensor was turned on for more realistic results. During the test, I used everyday apps like Microsoft Word and Safari. Some light 3D work was thrown into the mix to mix things up.

Application test

The time it takes to launch an app is essential for a proper user experience. The Air does well at this, so I used it as the benchmark. The Macbook Pro comes with a new generation of 750gb 5400rpm drives. The extra data density and latest Seagate technologies should give it the edge over previous Pro models. But how close can it get to its SSD speedy thinner sister?

906 posts

About author
Falls down a lot. Extreme beer maven. Coffee trailblazer. Hardcore twitter geek. Typical zombie fanatic. Skydiver, foodie, band member, International Swiss style practitioner and front-end developer. Producing at the nexus of aesthetics and intellectual purity to craft an inspiring, compelling and authentic brand narrative. Let's chat.
Articles
Related posts
Mac

MacBook Vs MacBook Pro - Which Laptop Is Best for You?

7 Mins read
The Apple MacBook has earned recognition for making a laptop that performs virtually well. The MacBook Pro is the following technology with…
Mac

iPhone 7, MacBook Air, AirPods, Bluetooth Speakers,

6 Mins read
If you are in the market for Apple gadgets, you can locate some excellent offers this week. The megastar of the display…
Mac

Find Out Why the New MacBook Pro Is Awesome

12 Mins read
Apple MacBook Pro thirteen” Review Ladies and gentlemen, I have an actual treat for you this week as I could be reviewing…